THREE HEATHER POEMS

Heather (In the Grass)

A horizontal promise with the grass

Hard to keep at the moment

But inescapable in the long run

Heather knowing

Still slides up the fencepost

Leaving empty loafers behind

She brushes past, already distant

Wandering the grassy depression

The smoke spread over the lawn

Heather dances

Polynesian in ripeness

Spinning slowly

As joints, quaaludes, acid

Airline vodka bottles

Fall from her pockets

The question isn’t how, but how far

How close to get to the grass

Without keeping the promise

Heather Rolling (Angels Biting God)

Ladder leaning on gym wall

Dark only the joint tip glow

Lying on the mildewy mats

Casual unguarded

Vapour shaded words

Deeply lidded meanings

The basketball floor creaks

Like an opening door

Heather holds my wrist

To steady the lighter

The proximity sprung with

Warmth perfume dopesmoke

Fantastic clarity

Enormous sensation

And angels biting God

High Waving Heather

Sly January Revealing
High Waving Heather
The Magician’s Assistant
Sawn In Half
Floating Through Space
Restricted By No Philosophy
Fettered By No Empirical Wisdom
The Light On Her Bare Arm
As She Twists And Glitters
Filled With Unexpected
Gleams And Shivers
Hidden Half Formulated
Secrets Breathing Gently
Her Poppy Fragrance
“The Old Firm Never Sleeps.”
The Ghost Stirring
Blue Compelling Strangely Hard
The Harlot Raising Her Head
At The Court Of The Rose Queen
The Celebrant Of The Festival
Swaying Under Her Own Mass
A Village Square Dance Cum Orgy
At The Sanctuary The Matted Thicket
The Cause Of The Panic Within The Disorder
Trembling Affright Terror
Dazzling And Glory Her Domain

Posted in Poetry | Leave a comment

Cool to be Cold?

It was eleven degrees (fahrenheit) when I walked in to work today. I guess I’m kind of an epicure, that is if I have a choice I’ll act for my own pleasure, so I wore a big old army coat, a hat with ear flaps (Netherlands army surplus) and a Pittsburgh Steelers scarf. It stands to reason to me to get bundled up when it’s cold, yet I was openly smirked at by several people I encountered along the way, and indeed I was out of step with the majority of my fellow pedestrians, who were less than seasonably dressed in sneakers, windbreakers, no hat or glove, etc. It’s a constant war to get my son and his middle school friends to wear anything but a hooded sweatshirt no matter what the temperature and my daughter’s high school peers may wear coats but absolutely refuse to zip them up. What gives? When I was young there was no shame in wearing something warm when it was cold — you wanted to, and it was kids without good coats who were pitied, rather than those whose parents made them wear them. When did being cold become cool?

Well, don’t worry — UBU will explain. As for most irrational behavior, the answers are cultural, and in the U.S. most current cultural values seem to derive from wealth and class. First of all there’s what I call the limo factor. You don’t see celebrities or rich people in coats very much (except at ski slopes, but that’s conspicuous consumption so it’s O.K.). The idea is that they’re in the real world for only moments as they dash from heated limo to heated nightclub, so they, protected by their cocoon of wealth and privilege, are isolated from the indignities of nature and even reality. Ever since Reagan all good things are assumed to drizzle down from the rich, so this attitude can now be found in the streets, even if it’s far from the reality of the individuals hypnotized by it. I don’t need a coat and hat, I’m just on my way to my car! It’s declasse not to have some expensive form of conveyance — the bike rider looks down on the pedestrian, the motorcyclist looks down on the bike rider, the motorist in the clunker looks down on the motorcyclist, the new car driver looks down on the guy in the clunker, etc., all the way to the fool in the Hummer, who, having the most ludicrously expensive and impractical vehicle of all feels superior to all. Walking, of course, is the healthiest, most thoughtful, most convenient, ecological, thriftiest form of conveyance, but if you do it you’re in peril of being mistaken for a poor person who is walking because they don’t have any choice. A lot of the walkers I run into are WALKING, that is, pumping their arms histrionically in their work out gear, puffing away, careful to signify Hey, I’m not walking to GET anyplace, I’m exercising! There are people who drive two blocks and take the elevator up to their Pilates class. We don’t want to break a sweat while working or getting anywhere, no that’s only for leisure when we pay to do it voluntarily. Similarly, Nature’s a non-factor in our daily lives because we can pay to protect ourselves from it. Again it’s something for leisure, for vacation, not for daily life.

The second reason comes from the opposite strata of society, but again it’s because of the diabolic work of Ronald Reagan. During his administration it was determined that as part of the "war on drugs" and to curry favor with the white middle class it would be a good idea to put a significantly larger percentage of young black man in prison. Since before the jazz age it’s just these young black man who have been the most significant avatars of youth culture. It should be no surprise, then, that the current trend among the youth is to dress as if you were in prison — ill-fitting, too large clothes, no belts, loose denim shirts, unlaced shoes, etc. But in prison you don’t think much about outerwear, do you? You’re INSIDE after all, and the government is not exactly going to spring for boots, decent overcoats, warm hats or gloves for you to promenade the yard in, are they? So suddenly COLD is COOL.

UBU is way to old to worry about being cool — or at least he has his own innate cool compass that’s not going to let a bunch or rich parasite celebrities or convicts tell HIM how to dress. So smirk all you want you lamebrains — you’ll be doing it through chattering teeth!

YR PAL,

UBU

Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

ASK UBU

Dear UBU,
 
Is it true that the real Mick Jagger was abducted by aliens and substituted with a counterfeit on the way to the studio for recording "Angie"?  Have you heard this theory before?  Amazing …. what was that, about 1974…?

 

Wondering,

FAHS

 
Dear Fahs,
 
Maybe it’s a fiendish plot to cause another wardrobe malfunction at the superbowl halftime show (exposing the lack rather than the presence of a nipple, perhaps?) and thereby further degrade the social fabric of America in preparation for an Alien invasion.
 
You do have to ask yourself how a band that created the brilliant EXILE ON MAIN STREET could follow it with the putrid GOAT’S HEAD SOUP. (Did it have anything to do with the fact that during the recording sessions in Jamaica Bill’s girlfriend was raped while he hid cringing under the bed?) But if an alien replicant of Mick Jagger could have come up with SOME GIRLS, then I’m building a landing strip in my back yard.
 
It also starts me to thinking (not again!) — why is interest in aliens and UFO sightings so cyclical? Is now a down time because we have "terrorists" and terrestrial illegal aliens to take the place of the inscrutable, menacing OTHER our psyche so plainly needs? Or is it that the aliens see human life more as a potentially hazardous experiment they have to monitor at regular intervals? An interesting facet of the "intelligent design" theory is that UFOlogists have noted the discrepancies in early human evolution for years, but found the solution in alien genetic tinkering and breeding programs (as well as the belief that those suckers couldn’t keep their appendages off our women — and who can blame them). The funny thing is that given the state of the rest of the world that’s a more credible answer than the actions of the infallible hand of a benevolent deity — but I don’t think that’s going to be taught in Kansas any time soon.
 
YR PAL,
UBU 
Posted in Culture | 1 Comment

The Ambition of the Age

I’ve just read two books — JIM MORRISON: LIFE, DEATH, LEGEND by Stephen Davis (author of HAMMER OF THE GODS one of the best rock’n’roll books ever) and READY, STEADY, GO!: THE SMASHING RISE AND GIDDY FALL OF SWINGING LONDON by Shawn Levy and they’ve made me nostalgic for the sixties. I think what I most admire about that time was the AMBITION of the age, how people weren’t just trying to have a hit record or become famous but really wanted to change life and modify perception. The DOORS did not just want to become successful but also wanted to live their ideals, both political and artistic, as evidenced by their egalitarian power and money distribution in the band and their improvisatory live appearances. The principle figures of the swinging London scene, fashion designers, photographer, musicians, art dealers, all intended to create a new aesthetic, and, if nothing else, shake up the hidebound, dull, class ridden society of the day. Thanks to e-bay I’ve also finally been able to own some sixties artifacts of legendary sixties events like a video of early ROLLING STONES live appearances or a CD of the infamous DOORS Miami concert. What strikes and impresses me about them is their sheer impact, the performers’ desire not just to entertain but to somehow TRANSPORT, of an era where TRANSGRESSION was assumed to be one of the responsibilities of the artist. To see Mick Jagger camping it up, threatening and ironic at once, playing with the gender ideals, camping it up in the middle of such stifling, traditional TV venues as the Ed Sullivan show is to see a performing genius, walking the tightrope of taste, the effect so powerful today that it’s hard to imagine how shocking it was then, juxtaposed with dreck like Pat Boone or even the firmly show biz rock groups like the Dave Clark Five. The fabled MIAMI CONCERT of the DOORS is another event whose reputation is misleading — rather than a drunken freak out by Jim it’s a deliberate provocation to the dynamics of the teenie bopper rock show, to all those ditto heads screaming for LIGHT MY FIRE. And Jim is actually in great vocal form, his voice as searing and strong as is any live performance of his I’ve heard. He wanted, as he says, to CHANGE THE WORLD, to create something rather than just tiredly reenact the same old act, to take it to the edge, the edge of sanity, of disaster, of meaning. Of course he eventually fell off that edge, and I’ve always been drawn to all those other sixties figures that did, like Brian Jones, or those that even managed to record an album or two between the edge of the cliff and the ground, like Syd Barrett or Skip Spence. In a way those casualties were just too sincere, took the whole thing too seriously, unlike the survivors who followed the ring of the cash registers to blandness. I think because I was a child in the sixties I probably took those ideals to heart more than the boomers did — when the draft was over anti-war sentiment was too, and when they could actually get good jobs the anti-materialism evaporated too. And like any other time a lot of the attitudes were embraced to get chicks or just because of fashion. But still, you can’t help contrasting those vibrant, revolutionary times to now — Antonioni and Godard versus Spielberg, or the putrid BONO’s brand of "activism," palling around with revolting pols like George W. Bush, not realizing that the Rove publicity machine  is using him for a credibility lending photo op and hasn’t any intention of helping any of the world’s poor vs. the MC5’s firebrand revolt. And of course that’s who the stupid Boomers allowed to lead them, not the earnest idealists like Gore or Kerry, but the guy who was yelling through a megaphone at a pep rally while the real guys were on the barricades. The freshness of POP art has NEVER been followed, and what we have in galleries now are commodities or absurdities, comprehensible only by their prices or some thesis hung next to them on the wall. Will there ever be any novelists as avidly devoured (and still avidly devoured) by the young as Kerouac, Burroughs or Salinger? Do any musical bands want to change things rather than exploit them? Certainly not the rappers, much as they whine, they’re more than happy to be bought off and play the show biz game. Then there’s GREEN DAY, being fresh and daring by aping third generation punk of another country and another decade, safely following the demographic rather than creating it, echoing a music style rather than making us hear a new kind of noise. Will there ever be another time like that? It’s been too long already — we might have to wait until all those hypocritical, tyrannical Boomers who started the last one have finally kicked off — in which case UBU might be too old, blind and deaf to notice anyway!!!
 
 
YR PAL,
UBU
Posted in Culture | 1 Comment

The Rightness of the Whale

I’m amazed — I’ve seen two contemporary movies in a row that have been pretty darn good. THE SQUID AND THE WHALE shares with the often aforementioned CAPOTE several qualities that make them outstanding. First of all they’re movies for adults in which the CONTENT is more important than the PACKAGING. They both feature great scripts and fantastic leading performances that are more about acting than starring, by talented men (in Squid’s case Jeff Daniels) who are not afraid to appear unsympathetic. There are no car chases, no computer generated special effects, and, although there is quite frank handling of S-E-X, there are no gratuitous flashes of teen tit. They both have that ambiguity thing, where those glorious grays of life are presented in full living color. They don’t restrict themselves to artificial constructs like "comedy" or "tragedy" but display the whole mixed range of the human condition including laughter, tears, snot, twisted grimaces, and cum. There’s also unusual subtlety, where not every significant detail is explained and highlighted, nor is the viewer’s emotional response over determined by either artificial plot twists or swelling music (although the sound track is fantastic). Anyone who thought MILLION DOLLAR BABY was anything but claptrap melodrama should be forced to see these two movies a few million times. THE SQUID AND THE WHALE is more centered on that staple of American "serious" culture, the family romance, but manages to avoid sentimentality, psychological fatuity, portentousness, and all the other potholes of that over traveled highway. Being the son of a University instructor I appreciated only too well the film’s acute understanding  that the habits of a teacher — the tendency to lecture rather than listen and the substitution of pithy comments and judgements for conversation — do not always what make for good fatherhood. Having served my time in a creative writing program at about the time the film was set, I can also tell you that the sexual politics of that overheated hothouse, with everyone seeking the approval of one guru, and the desperately attempting to curry favor from some pretty dissolute characters by any means including (especially) erotic (ANNA PAQUIN! playing the principle female hustler) were bang on. As a merchant to many academics I can testify that the keen satirical presentation of a class considering themselves mentally superior to everyone else while in fact being totally clueless was valid as well. Will either of these fine movies or even their grosses combined make as much money as, say, THE DUKES OF HAZARD? UBU fears he knows the answer and, knowing it, fears for the republic as well!
 
 
YR PAL,
UBU
Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

Serial Capote

I’ve been reading Lawrence Grobel’s CONVERSATIONS WITH CAPOTE and it’s as entertaining as anything Capote wrote. It made me realize that one of the reasons the movie CAPOTE is so good is that it features the two greatest characters Capote ever created — himself and Perry Smith. (I’ll pass on Holly Golightly who I’ve always seen as a coded male hustler). One of the tests of a good character is that it can be played differently by two different actors with success — Robert Blake (cast as a murderer? No!) playing Smith in the film of IN COLD BLOOD and Clifton Collins, Jr. doing the gentle slaughterer in CAPOTE. Philip Seymour Hoffman, of course, does the titular character, while Truman Steckfus Persons played him in real life, and I have to say, given the latter’s precipitous decline, Hoffman probably does Capote better than Capote did at the end.  That’s the problem — characters are good fictional approximations of humans in culture, but a real person who makes a character out of himself runs the risk of becoming a caricature. That was the triumph and the downfall of Truman — he killed on television and popular culture because he was so easily recognizable in a few simple strokes, an early master of the sound bite. In today’s world where resolution and depth are becoming smaller and slighter only the overblown translates to all the T.V., phone, computer screens and emerges over all the other noise constantly thrown at us. Look at Pam Anderson (another "author") — she’s the reigning sex bomb because  she’s so completely over determined, with silicon pumped breasts, collagen laden lips, tattooed eyes and peroxided hair — so over the top she’s a female female impersonator, able to be understood to represent "sexy" in any language, on any kind of grainy media. Truman’s wit, candor and spirit are admirable, and IN COLD BLOOD is a hell of a book, but you have to find him responsible, or at least a harbinger of, that kind of devolution in our world. If, as he says in CONVERSATIONS literature is gossip, then gossip can pose as literature. If writers become celebrities, then celebrities can become writers leading to such abominations as Nicole Richie’s novel or Madonna’s children’s books.  His fascination with criminals and his elevation of them to modern celebrity has led us to garbage like GROWING UP GOTTI (Victoria Gotti yet another "writer"), and a society that makes no differentiation between talent and notoriety. His blurring of the distinction between fact and fiction, the "non-fiction" novel, is echoed in the horror of "reality" T.V. Even a contemporary literary figure like Dave Eggers can write a best-selling memoir and then set himself up as the literary light of the world, castigating honest novelists like Updike and Roth, men who have spent their lives writing novels and not just transcribing their life. In my own neck of the woods there’s a  local cover boy named Davey Rothbart who had the high concept of starting a magazine called FOUND containing "found" notes, etc. (though some of them do seem quite made up) and achieved success and national talk show fame and on the strength of that published a book of short stories with a major publisher, though how printing found notes translates into an ability to write an exacting art form is unclear to me, as it would be to anyone who read said book. I just finished an alleged piece of journalism he wrote containing such brilliant, erudite observations as "It was fucking amazing." In short in a culture so jammed with entertainment there seems to be a crucial lack of imagination. Even 9/11 can be seen as a result of this lack — Bush and his cronies just couldn’t imagine that something like that would happen, the same way they were so totally unable to picture what would happen in Iraq beside their own fantasies. They tell you in grade school how important imagination is, but out in the real world it’s considered highly suspect and dangerous, unless, of course, it’s something the boss’s boss has thought up. I guess UBU’s out of luck then — I just can’t turn my darn imagination off!
 
 
YR PAL,
UBU
Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

First Chapter of my Novel

Here it is — the first chapter of my novel called SNAKES IN CAVES — rights and representation still available!!!!
 
 

1.

 

You have to bow your head when you enter Pittsburgh. It’s surrounded on almost every side by mountains, so in order to get in you must first pass through a tunnel — a long, low, ceramic tiled tube, narrow and teeming with rushing cars. Enter and there’s the sudden cut off of sunlight, and then the moment when there’s nothing but tunnel, no outside light or sound, even the radio shushed to static, just a diffuse aquatic glow and a rushing babble and buoyancy; but you’re not underwater, you’re under earth, with green, chipped guard rail pipes flashing by on one side and the front half of a grey car and grim driver on the other. You’ve left your former straight highway overworld for this timeless, dark purgatory beneath the ground, slouching slowly toward something that’s not at all apparent, like being in a cave.

Think — weren’t the mysteries at Eleusis sort of like this, the most famous ritual of the ancient Greeks, a subterranean procession toward a suddenly growing light, like Persephone, say, stepping out of hell into spring…but maybe that was just me, starting to lose it a little, overintellectualising over the claustrophobic panic when what I really needed to do was to keep my overloaded car within the restricting lane, to try and fight the feeling that the floor tile was as slippery and endless as it looked with the reflection of the murky ceiling florescents rising from it in an icy sheen.

No, but wait, really, wasn’t it even more ancient than the Greeks, our universal tunnel journey, suspended in a suffocating length, pushed out, pushed out into what? A flicker less dim, then BOOM — born into the world, bright and beyond human imagination — who could imagine or even correctly remember that — coming out of the tunnel and onto the bridge in the streaming sunlight, like it or not, water jetting up from the fountain, colors refracting over the looming glass rectangles of downtown, Three Rivers Stadium, for crying out loud, and below three real rivers, two joining into one, right there the green pubes of the city, the legs winding into a trunk. After all isn’t this the birthplace of Pittsburgh? The reason? (Literally) The Point? George Washington himself stood astride the sharp mouth of it, the father of our country, casting his seed in the water.

And I drove like I was tearing into it all, out of a somnolent womb and into this glaring, startling buzz, off the bridge and curving beside the river, lanes merging from all sides with brief glimpses of downtown popping up between long streams of traffic — and, believe me, I knew as well as anyone how dangerous it all could be. After all, wasn’t this the place that Eleanora Duse, on her deathbed in the Schenley hotel, called Pittsboorg – la plus hideuse ville du monde, Sir Henry Irving’s Hell, with the lid off, the city Frank Lloyd Wright advised abandoning? The place where I’d not only been born but had also almost died?

Things were veering in a dangerous direction, and for a moment of wild sunlight and traffic I couldn’t tell where I was going, glancing down at the book on the seat beside me as if for reassurance, a copy of my book, the black cover warped and moldy, all but illegible with water damage. A few months ago Virginia had sent it to me, or rather returned it, in that condition, an insubstantial enough gesture, certainly, but one which still, as much as any of Pittsburgh’s responsibilities or opportunities, summoned me here.

But then — the old dodge, I turned up and off and everything went back to regular speed, people trudging with grocery bags in front of the common wall tenements that arched up the hills, stop signs but no cars, the radio back to playing the same rock it’s always played. I crept around the corner until, there it was, my favorite intersection, the occult spot where Hamlet meets Ophelia. I turned here and back into traffic on the Boulevard of the Allies and on my left was Magee Women’s Hospital, the place where I was born, exactly two hundred years after Pittsburgh, and then I floored it because the city that’s always talking about renaissance is the place where I had to be reborn, like those Pilgrims at Eleusis, or like Dante, Incipit Vita Nuova, begin the new life, because I knew all too well what the alternative to that was.

 
 
Posted in Entertainment | Leave a comment

Sax and Tend

One of the things you notice when you go out in your daily life in the US is that people are always asking you for money. I don’t mean just the homeless and the Salvation Army, but now it’s kids asking for their band or swimming programs, their teachers for  school supplies, people at your door for the environment, your various schools for the endowment, churches for their various socio-religious programs, all kinds of people for all kinds of disaster survivors and a million other things — today at the drugstore they wanted me to give a "penny and up" for diabetes research. And why is this — simple — THE GOVERNMENT IS NO LONGER DOING ITS JOB! It’s so easy and politically expedient to be against taxes but — hello! — they pay for services that people need. Sorry, but taxes are the fairest and most efficient way to raise money for the public good, and handouts — the charities so beloved of Bush types — are probably the worst. Me giving five dollars for whatever isn’t the same as Bush giving five dollars, because he’s got a million times more to give but the handout system makes that seem fair. It’s also so much easier to shaft unpopular people — prisoners and the poor — who don’t have economic or political clout (pretty much the same thing these days). Nobody’s going to donate to make prison conditions less obscenely overcrowded, but when tax cuts make for budget cuts the weak and powerless are the first thrown over the side of the yacht the rich can now afford. We’re no longer funding our schools adequately, we’re letting the infrastructure rot, and the health care system bankrupts both individuals and corporations (but thank god one of Bush’s great triumphs is to make those bankrupts suffer more). It’s the usual total materialism and short sighted need for instant gratification that characterizes contemporary life. With the "please donate" system the good people, the people with consciences end up paying more while the jerks can hoard more money. Let’s own up to it — the "ownership" society is a crock and taxes, as every government has known for all of history are not inherently evil. Making the other guy take care of your fellow man is.
 
YR PAL,
UBU
Posted in News and politics | Leave a comment

Truth From Fiction

Lee Child is a writer I avoided for a while — his books look like what I call "airport" books, you know the ones they sell in airports and drug stores, big and squat, tending to have things like bloody hand prints on the covers. But I had enough people rave about him that I decided to take a chance and was very pleasantly surprised. Child’s books are thrillers, but they have the elements that used to be associated with fiction before the academics took it over, elements like plot, character, pacing and provocative ideas. Jack Reacher is the protagonist, an existential hero who has no possessions, few human ties and the ability to beat up anybody in the room, all of which give him the opportunity to always speak his mind and travel the country righting wrongs. The best book in the series so far is THE ENEMY, a sort of prequel to the rest where it is revealed how Jack came to leave his beloved position as an Army MP and become the rootless loner he is today. The mainspring of the plot is activated by a faction of the army who are displeased with the prospect of their status being lowered because there is no more USSR for them to oppose.
 
 
Instantly, of course, I thought of another evil, nefarious faction who are constantly trying to take over the country — the Republican party. Anti-Communism has been the main club the Republican used to belabor their enemies since Joe McCarthy, and the essence of their modern identity. The "us vs. them" world view is necessary for the smug, hubristic country club self-image and when they lost the USSR, they lost some of themselves as well. No longer could they reflexively brand their enemies communists, no more could they justify war crimes and support for dictators as fighting communism, and no more could the red menace be used as a way to shovel the public’s tax money into the pockets of that old military-industrial complex. A certain ennui crept in, as evidenced by Bush I’s relatively aimless administration and his tepid re-election campaign, leading to (sigh) the Clinton administration (and shame on all of you who nit-picked him  — who doesn’t wish he was president today). Now, it’s a stretch to say Bush II was elected president, but he did get quite a few votes, mostly on the American whim to switch from Coke to Pepsi for a change, little knowing the poisonous brew they were imbibing. Bush didn’t really have much direction at first — people don’t remember that his big defense priority at the start was to get that Start Wars missile defense system finally built. Then came 9/11 and suddenly the Republicans had found their lever with which to move the world. Quickly they dragged out all Reagan’s old speeches, crossed out Communism and crayoned in Terrorism. Terrorism — what a boon! Finally a name for what we’re fighting and what to say those who oppose us are soft on. Never mind that Terrorism is a tactic and not an ideology — a tactic used by us during the American revolution as well as any other force who didn’t have overwhelming material advantage. But it sure sounds like a good thing to fight — I mean who isn’t against Terrorism? And using the argument that Saddam was a terrorist — not really connected to the terrorists who were responsible for 9/11, but if people were under that misapprehension Bush sure wasn’t going to correct it — and we had to fight him because of it. In the same way that the Viet Cong must be destroyed because they were communists, even though they weren’t really planning to nuke or invade us, Iraq must be defeated because of this evil taint, even though they (before the invasion) weren’t really that friendly with Osama. But the Bush crowd didn’t really learn their Nam lessons, and certainly failed to pick up on more contemporary history like Yugoslavia. That lesson was that if there is a artificially constructed country held together only by a repressive regime when that regime is removed, the pieces will fly apart and the ancient enmities resurface. Sure, some of the factions in Iraq use terrorist tactics, but to say, as Bush continues to do in his "sober judgement" that we are fighting a terrorism that somehow threatens American freedom is only marginally effective as rhetoric and absolutely absurd as an assessment of fact. It seems like people are ever so slowly tumbling on to the reality of it, but, in our hyper-masculine, hyper-nationalist land they’re still quite nervous about being called weak on terrorism, of not "staying in the fight." Because there’s no draft, the college students, safe in their beer soaked MTV cocoon can’t be bothered to tear their eyes from Paris Hilton. The people who are actually being killed come from the underclass, the dream lumpen carefully shaped over decades to be the perfect consumers who can be sold anything with a sound bite and a slogan, who hold manliness next to godliness and confuse patriotism with NASCAR racing. In classic terror theory we’ve done far more damage to our liberty by our reaction to the terrorist attack than the attack itself accomplished. But what do I know — I’m just a commun — I mean terror — oh, heck –just brand me with the next -ism the Republicans use to blacken the Republic.
 
YR PAL,
UBU  
Posted in Books and Politics | Leave a comment

Non Capote Mentis

Well, I’ll tell you what set me off today — some moron on AOL gave the movie CAPOTE a one star review that claimed it was boring and a great opportunity to grab an nap. BORING! Yeah, I guess if you call great acting, writing and fairly profound ideas boring he was right, but otherwise that’s the opinion of a total IDIOT! Have we become so stupefied by special effects and gratuitous sex and violence, so used to be manipulated as to what to think and feel that we can’t even recognize a good movie when appears before our eyes? Is this nation so populated by hypno-zombie undead that we need to be hit over the head with an obvious hammer before we can feel anything? Critics like CAPOTE, but it’s not setting any box office records. I guess the last election provided that the gap between intelligent people and the programmed hoi polloi is growing daily. Although CAPOTE is no masterpiece along the lines of, say, Godard’s CONTEMPT — I thought it dragged a bit three quarters of the way through (UBU believes most movies should be ninety minutes long) — but it has a killer ending (so to speak) and engages some deep themes. I liked that it was a movie for grown ups by grown ups. It was able to keep its consistent period authenticity because there were no teen starlettes or aging leading men in it who refused to give up their contemporary haircuts or clothes. There were no matinee idols who were afraid of appearing unsympathetic or unglamorous. What is more, like most good art, it is AMBIGUOUS and doesn’t lead you by the hand to some trite conclusion about life and the characters. Like the STONES say it’s all about MIXED EMOTIONS, and CAPOTE captures a lot of what it means to be an artist — how one is a subjective part of life and yet an objective observer of it, how the writer, even with loved ones (or maybe especially with them) is engaged on a human level, yet almost inhumanly using them for material. At some point the WORK ITSELF becomes paramount and EVERYTHING else is sacrificed to it — sometimes at grave cost to both artist and subject. I also liked the way it illuminated the fact that EROS is so often the midwife to creation — that the SEXUAL becomes the TEXTUAL. But the whole movie is worth the way the veins on Philip Seymour Hoffman’s head pop up in the scene where he bids the boys a final good-bye.
 
YR PAL,
UBU 
Posted in Culture | Leave a comment